diff --git a/modules/workflows/processing/modes/modeDynamic.py b/modules/workflows/processing/modes/modeDynamic.py
index f91a4080..dac6211f 100644
--- a/modules/workflows/processing/modes/modeDynamic.py
+++ b/modules/workflows/processing/modes/modeDynamic.py
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ class DynamicMode(BaseMode):
         
         state = TaskExecutionState(taskStep)
         # Dynamic mode uses max_steps instead of max_retries
-        state.max_steps = max(1, int(getattr(workflow, 'maxSteps', 5)))
+        state.max_steps = max(1, int(getattr(workflow, 'maxSteps', 10)))
         logger.info(f"Using Dynamic mode execution with max_steps: {state.max_steps}")
         
         step = 1
diff --git a/modules/workflows/processing/shared/executionState.py b/modules/workflows/processing/shared/executionState.py
index a783e544..fd1299cf 100644
--- a/modules/workflows/processing/shared/executionState.py
+++ b/modules/workflows/processing/shared/executionState.py
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ def shouldContinue(observation: Optional[Observation], review=None, current_step
     try:
         # Stop if max steps reached
         if current_step >= max_steps:
+            logger.info(f"Stopping workflow: reached max_steps limit ({current_step} >= {max_steps})")
             return False
         
         # Check review decision (can be ReviewResult model or dict)
diff --git a/modules/workflows/processing/shared/promptGenerationActionsDynamic.py b/modules/workflows/processing/shared/promptGenerationActionsDynamic.py
index c0af7adf..ae59fafc 100644
--- a/modules/workflows/processing/shared/promptGenerationActionsDynamic.py
+++ b/modules/workflows/processing/shared/promptGenerationActionsDynamic.py
@@ -328,6 +328,11 @@ DOCUMENTS: {{KEY:AVAILABLE_DOCUMENTS_INDEX}}
 === NEXT ACTIONS ===
 Follow the improvement suggestions from CONTENT VALIDATION in priority order. Each suggestion indicates what action to take next.
 
+CRITICAL: Use structureComparison and gap information from CONTENT VALIDATION to determine what is MISSING:
+- Check "structureComparison.found" vs "structureComparison.required" to see what's already delivered
+- Check "structureComparison.gap" to see what's missing. If quantitative gaps are available, use them.
+- Next action should ONLY generate the MISSING part, NOT repeat what's already delivered
+
 === OUTPUT FORMAT ===
 {{
   "status": "continue",
@@ -347,9 +352,11 @@ Follow the improvement suggestions from CONTENT VALIDATION in priority order. Ea
 - nextActionParameters: concrete parameters (check AVAILABLE_METHODS for valid names)
 - documentList: ONLY exact references from AVAILABLE_DOCUMENTS_INDEX (do not invent)
 - nextActionObjective: describe what this action will achieve based on the FIRST improvement suggestion from CONTENT VALIDATION
+- CRITICAL: Use structureComparison.gap to specify the missing part in nextActionParameters
 - Do NOT repeat failed actions - suggest DIFFERENT approach
 - If ACTION HISTORY shows repeated actions, suggest a fundamentally different approach
 - nextActionObjective must directly address the highest priority improvement suggestion from CONTENT VALIDATION
+- If validation shows partial data delivered, next action should CONTINUE from where it stopped, not restart
 
 """